Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label Screenplay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Screenplay. Show all posts

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Review : UP IN THE AIR

10 million miles is too huge distance is too huge distance to travel. How much time you need to travel that distance? Ask Ryan Bingham (George Clooney), he knows it since he had done it.

 

Ryan Bingham's firm has expertise in firing the people from their jobs. Company which want to get downsized gives contract to Ryan Bingham's firm to fire people without creating any hassles and complications for that company. Ryan Bingham travels for 321 days across the country firing the people and enjoys the luxury of preferential treatment he gets while traveling. His target is to attain mileage of 10 million air miles. In one of his assignments, Ryan meets Alex (Vera Farmiga). Their meeting leads to a casual relationship between them. One day, Ryan's firm decided to adopt cost-cutting measures by grounding all its on-road employees. Now the company wants to use the technology to fire people just by sitting in Omaha, the location of Ryan's office. This idea is brainchild of Natalie (Anna Kendrick) who has just joined the company. Ryan doesn't agree with this idea since it is difficult to connect with to-get-fired employees emotionally and psychologically through internet. Ryan's boss tells him to take Natalie with him in further assignments so that she can learn the tricks.

The best moments of movie begin from here with Natalie's boyfriend breaking off with her through text message. More hilarious moments follows. Also it appears that Ryan and Alex’s casual relationship is leading to somewhere. After few downsizing assignments, Ryan's boss decides that Natalie has learned enough to do the job herself. So it is the best time for Natalie to use her idea of technology in doing the assignment. Since Ryan has been grounded, he thinks of all his relationships and tries to reconnect with them. He attends his sisters’ marriage along with Alex and also tries to give a surprise to Alex by visiting her home in Chicago.

The end part of the movie begins here with unraveling of twists leading to interesting climax.

 

All the characters were well sketched. Each of the main actors deserves an Oscar nomination, though it is tough for them to win, due to presents of strong contenders. The role of Ryan Bingham was tailor made for Clooney. Vera Farmega underplayed her character and did full justice to it. Anna Kendrick was awesome and most likable character of all.

First half of movie was funny and sarcastic. It helped to build the second half. Second half was more intense. It builds the sympathy for the character of Ryan though everyone want to hate him for job he does.

The music and the songs were beautiful, especially the song shot during the Ryan's sisters wedding.

The dialogues and screenplay was brilliant. Some of the dialogues will become cult. The one dialogue which will always remain in my mind is “Loyalty is not cheap”

My Rating: 3/5

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Road to Oscars

Oscar night is approaching.  People started guessing and predicting the winners. I thought i also predict for important categories.

Best Feature Film: Hurt Locker

Best Director: Unable to choose between James Cameron(Avatar) and Kathryn Bigalow(Hurt Locker)

Best Actor: Jeff Bridges (Crazy Heart). Sorry "George Clooney"

Best Actress: Sandra Bullock(The blind side)

Best Supporting Actor: No doubt it is Chritoph Waltz (Inglorious Basterds)

Best Supporting Actress: Mo'Nique (Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire)

Best Original Screenplay : I believe it is Quentin Tarantino(Inglorious Basterds) but Mark Boal(Hurt Locker) can upset the applecart

Best Adapted Screenplay: Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner (Up In the Air)

The D-day will only tell how close or not i was.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

ISHQIYA- Review

Vishal Bharadwaj has been referred to as India’s Quentin Tarantino. But figuratively speaking, in ISHQIYA , the writing of Bhardwaj is 'hatke', but no way closer to Tarantino's style.

The structure of the film is as follows:
Act1: Setup
The film begins with Krishna (Vidya Balan) who is married and in love with Vidhyadhar Verma. One night a gas cylinder bursts in their house killing -Verma. 
Faraway, Khalujaan (Naseeruddin Shah) and Baban (Arshad Warsi) escape from the clutches of Mushtaqbhai and run away with the heist money. They reach Gorakhpur  to take Verma’s help to cross the border. They stay as a guest in Verma 's house on request of his widow, Krishna. However, Mushtaqbhai traces them and gives deadline to return money. Krishna coaxes them to be part of a kidnapping plan she has devised.

Act2: Confrontation
They plan to kidnap an industrialist for a ransom and successfully kidnap him. Meanwhile both of them fall in love with Balan. This causes friction among the duo. Krishna ditches them both when they were fighting with each other.

Act3: Resolution
If I narrate this part, I will be guilty of playing as a spoilsport. I found this part of the movie to be weakest among three. In any other film this climax could be called as great but here it is not up to the mark set by previous 2 acts of the movie.

Every character in this movie has been sketched brilliantly with each character  having subtle gray shade.
The movie was not a conflict between good and evil. Instead it is a conflict between wronged person and wrongdoer.

Naseeruddin Shah is brilliant as always.  Post-Munnabhai, it is one of the best movies of Arshad Warsi. Vishal Bharadwaj's movies always have strong leading women. Vidya balan is seductive as well as docile.

The movie is directed by debutant director 'Abhishek Choubey' but not in the single frame of the movie, his inexperience could be found out. The song  'Dil to baccha hai ji' is brilliantly shot.

The dialogues are funny, though some are crude. All the characters are talking in MP-UP accent.
The music is incredible and the all the songs have become hit.


My Rating: 3/5

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Art of Narration

Most of us know lot of stories and want to write it, but choosing the style of narration is always a problem. How interesting is the  book or a movie depends on the way the story is narrated. There are different styles of narration. Let us first define each style and then understand their importance.

First Person Narration: The narrator is part of story and narrates it as seen by him and experienced by him. The reader/viewer/listener only knows that part of story in which narrator is present. Out of the multiple events that happened at particular time-frame , the viewer can know only the details of the event in which the narrator is present.
Eg. 
        I went to Ram's  house and rang the bell. He opened the door and asked surprisingly.
           "Why did you come so early?"
         "I had no other work at home. So i left the home early."  I replied cautiously.


Third Person Narration:  The narrator tells the story from a general perspective. He has knowledge of all the events happening during that instant. If the narrator in this style of narration is not known, then author himself is considered to be the narrator implicitly.
Eg.
   Sam went to Ram's house and rang the bell. Latter opened the door and asked surprisingly.
           "Why did you come so early?"
         "I had no other work at home. So i left the  home early." was  Sam's cautious reply.

Unreliable Narration: Whenever narrator stops being objective and becomes subjective, then the reliability of his version is under suspicion. Here narrator tells the story from his perspective and expects viewers/listeners too agree with his views.


You people may have doubt in mind regarding the absence of  "second person narration".  First we have to understand who can qualify for the second person from above examples. Ram is the second person since 'I' is the first person.  If you write from the perspective of  Ram then  Ram becomes 'I' and 'I' becomes Sam. So "second person narration" is positively  interchangeable with "First person narration".

Let us answer few questions to understand importance of each style of  "Narration".

 When and how does the "First Person Narration" style helps?
First person narration works in detective stories because it helps to maintain the suspense. Since, whatever is known to the narrator are the only things we are also sure off until the some concrete evidence comes in the hands of narrator. Most famous detective stories about  Sherlock Holmes, Hercules Poirot(few of them) and Byomkesh Bakshi  are the first person narration and narrator is their closest friend and chronicler. The methods of deduction,threads of thoughts and logic application of  these great detectives are unknown  to these narrators most of the times, thus bringing surprise element to the readers when detectives explain their deduction logic to their chroniclers at the end of the stories.

Besides detective stories, "First Person Narration" will be helpful in what other stories?
This type of narration is useful in autobiographical stories where readers can relate to the central character and feel his experiences, both joy and hardships.

When and how does the "Third Person Narration" style helps?
When a story has  multiple central characters and each one's story needs to be told and also when  the story has multiple important events taking place in same time-frame and they need to be told at that moment itself. For these types of stories, "Third person narration" is needed. Third person narration is mostly used, since story-telling gets easier as sudden scenario and time-frame jump  is possible. Some events are purposely left unexplained by author to create environment of  suspense. This methodology sometimes makes us feel that author is cheating us by cutting a scene at important moments though he is aware of all incidents happening at that moment.

 Are there important subdivisions of "Third Person Narration"?
 This narration can be objective as well as subjective. In objective narration, author builds it characters such  that their behaviour and characteristics itself is sufficient for readers to judge personality of characters while in subjective narration, author also judges the personality of the characters.

Which type of narration is suitable for screen?
'Third Person Narration'  is used for writing for plays. For movies, both types of  narration can be used. If 'First person narration' is used in movie, the narrator has to share nearly equal screen-space with protagonist.

Can we use both types of narration is same story?
Yes, In a First Person Narrated story, If there is a scenario where narrator is not present but it is necessary to be explained to readers/viewers, then the author narrates that particular scenario in third person.

Where is unreliable narration style used?
This type of narration is basically used in movies. Subjective narration is sometimes unreliable. Some narrators do it for purpose of introducing comic twists or some want to make viewers think. Some examples of unreliable  narrators are Verbal  Kint, played by Kevin Spacey, in The Usual Suspects, Leonard Shelby, played by Guy Pearce, in Memento and Future "Ted Mosby" in sitcom How I met your Mother.
Viewers know they are unreliable when the scenes or sequence of scenes displayed on screen are contradictory to what they mention in narration, which runs parallel to displayed scenes.
It is difficult to write books using unreliable narration style, unless author mentions both what actually happened and what the narrator wants the reader to believe. Therefore,we can say that this is not impossible but tough style to adapt in books.

How does narrating a story in book different from that on screen?
Third person narrated books can reveal everything without telling anything which is not possible on the screen.
for e.g. consider a scenario in which two persons are discussing about a crime which they are going to commit.
In Books, the particular scene can be written as follows:

   "When should we commit the crime?", asks man in black suit.
   " Tomorrow evening " ,replies other man who is sitting opposite to him.

In another scene of same story, a character called Sam is introduced. The author has liberty to tell when should those two men's identity to be revealed and is one of them is Sam.

Consider same scenario in a movie. If two persons are talking in a particular scene , they are visible on the screen and they are easily identifiable. In later scene, character called Sam is introduced, the viewer can easily identify that Sam is not one of those men. The suspense element in the story which was maintained  in the book is lost in the movie.
 

Importance of  narration is clearly explained by above answers. So whenever we need  to write a book or screenplay, I hope we will chose the style of  narration which will be suitable for our story. Narration is not just a style but also an art of expression.